HOW CONGRESS COULD REIN IN GOOGLE AND FACEBOOK
In April, Mark Zuckerberg had asked for the Cambridge analysis prior to St. Commerce and Judiciary committees. It was a cruelty serious, and legislators were ready for new laws.
“It should be a jack-up call for the tech community,” said Sen. John Thon (chairman), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee.
Democrats were not too soft. The rating rating committee said, “If Facebook and other online companies will not be able to solve private privacy,” said Saint Bill Nelson, a rating rating committee, “Then We have to do. We Congress. ”
After six months and many seriousness, the Congress is still able to cope with that the fact that fixing can be the case of confidentiality. The Congress has plans to protect its data privacy law, after the EU’s new duty protection regulation (GDPR) rules, and how it has written that Google and Facebook How important are companies like?
“The question is whether it is the decision to raise the law.”
Industry leaders and consumer counselors have already closed the horn on bill provisions, whether they refuse to enforce the states of their independent privacy or explain personal information at all. This fight will determine how the U.S. government will help prevent privacy privacy practices for potential privacy.
Prior to a commercial hearing in Tunisia last month, Tunon said, “These developments are jointly shared to the conglomerate’s issue of the privacy of consumer data at Congress’s door.” This question is no more that the privacy of consumers Need a federal law to protect. The question is, what is the form of this law?
How far are the data consensors more?
One of the most significant differences between the first and the GDPP’s Internet is that consumers are asked to consolidate the data. Under GDP, consumers can scrap them for data, before it is necessary to give some form of clear consent to the users. They must provide a way to accept consent at any time. Whatever specifications, some versions of these transparency and control requirements will be in any legislation.
After the Cambridge Analysis Scandal, the most important “opt-in” bills were exposed, they see user’s consent failure. Allows several bills to collect users by mistake, or at least notify the users that their data is headed and for this purpose. The Republican R (TN-B) brochure act, and both the Sen-Edge Marketing Act, is required to provide both sides (D-MA) Consultant Act so that users can opt out before submitting any sensitive data. This is different from the current model, where companies like Google provide opt-out models in profile settings options somewhere.
But if these bills are implemented in law, they can not criminalize events such as other Cambridge analyzes. These two bills cover only data related to sensitive information such as social security numbers, biometric data, and accurate geographic information. Cambridge analysts check the data checkpoint that is generally not considered “sensitive”, such as interests and location checks.
When the infringer comes to inform users, listen to it. Amy Kulkar (DMM) and Jan Kennedy (RL) social media privileges and user rights act have implemented a 72-hour window, which is equivalent to one implementation. By gdrr The Marketing Bill will prepare the Federal Trade Commission to stop the requirements of disclosing the situation in which “damages may potentially occur.” So far, the FTC does not have any authority when they make tech companies responsible for violations of privacy. Some of them will enforce the administration with the authority of government administration like the FCC’s Telecom authority, will effectively set up the FTC as the implementation of a strong new federal privacy. .
It is also proposed when the user comes with control over other ways outside the Congress action. During the summer, Center Mark Warner (D-V) filed many suggestions for regulating the tax, including a person, who would consider the platform as “informative lenders”. Basically, these providers do not have to work against their customers’ interests like medicine, law, and finance, Facebook social media platforms like providers as their body. This rule can be administered by a number of government agencies which are growing rapidly from any bill by the Congress. If approved, it will keep these companies at the highest level ever before.
Which countries are as sensitive data?
Historically, personal details, such as the phone book, were easily found in the same way as equality, when compared to the maximum “serious” pieces of data, compared with credit card information and social security numbers.However, over the past decade or more, this debate has developed. Anonymously, harmful and emotionally linked to a legal name associated with anonymous username for Reddit or Oakside, even if they do not violate any technique. People who have more stringent laws believe in some consumer counselors who are involved in law enforcement.
Laura Mio, the central executive director of the Georgian law’s law privacy, said, “In the past several years, we have acknowledged in the past several years, these people have a great deal of confidentiality in more information than those Identities can be used to steal. ” “[Stolen] Emotional damage to theft stealing information, even if not their financial information.”
This definition also includes several calls from this term, it can also be included in the list when it is not permissible to regulate some specific weapons about confidentiality and to leave these data forms.
Kennedy-Klobcher Bill is more seriously related to personal information such as user’s email and phone number more seriously. Both the ITI and the Internet Association have set up a framework that will provide users more control over their own data, ensuring that they can delete them to collect and delete information. . But in ITI’s proposal, consumers will have to be clearly convinced to collect sensitive information, not more personal pieces like phone numbers.
Bulb Burns and Marketing Bills are largely limited, in which we are generally considered “seriously considered.” This information is included in the taxpayer, but it has more personal details such as emails, phone numbers, and “any information available for the name” is enough. A road and city or town, including physical address, “Also. If it takes federal laws as a guide to broadening, a broad appreciation will be appreciated by one of the clauses offered by Klobie, depending on what kind of data, when severe punishment for companies Will get
Prior to this month, Facebook announced that 30 million accounts are agreeing that authentication of logs through hackers will be obtained through security deficit. According to Facebook, hackers were able to get only some basic security information such as consumer names, e-mail, and phone numbers. If Kobhark Bill is approved, Facebook needs a law to infringe their personal details to their personal users.
A Hack-party law wants to strengthen legislative states
As the Congress has expressed, some of the strongest securities of privacy are from the State Level Bill such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCCA). Under this law, companies need to give users the option to opt out to sell and collect their data. If a company continues to do so, consumers can be prosecuted. But industry leaders are now being emphasized for the voluntary clause in the federal bill, which will have to withdraw the CCCA and any future bills can be passed in this way. If the clause is included, a relatively strong federal bill can also be a step back in privacy protection for states such as California.
Nudistist leaders say that the only federal standard will make it easy to simplify the new rules of business. But for privacy groups, it is the only way of lobby against strong states. Nea Singh Singh, senior lawmaker adviser of US citizen, US citizen last month said in an update that “it is often of state laws – not the Congress – who has tried to protect consumer privacy.” “It knows private sector, and many companies try to stop it.”
Data is subordinate legislation in all 50 states and their strong laws in some states last year insist on the resignation of implementing the National Survey under a large scale violation of the Credit Monitoring Company.
“If federal standards are strong and to deal with new threats, states can not see the need to move their laws to meet these standards. But if not, then to maintain the ability to do this For the public can be improved.
When this Congress runs on these proposals, it is not saying that this can not happen soon, but discussion, listening and proposed legislation shows that the lawmakers are asking questions that the rope of the tech giant What can you do?
For the next few months, expectations for further listening, inquiry posts, and federal investigations are expected, but no real, dramatic changes are expected to expect companies to collect your data such as Facebook and Google And be broadcast The Commerce Department has not yet proposed its framework, but it has been announced once, more discussion is possible Until now, most of the discussions are targeting lawmakers only for their future.